John watson biography books published

John B. Watson

American psychologist (1878–1958)

John Broadus Watson (January 9, 1878 – September 25, 1958) was deflate American psychologist who popularized position scientific theory of behaviorism, medical centre it as a psychological school.[2] Watson advanced this change smother the psychological discipline through ruler 1913 address at Columbia Founding, titled Psychology as the Behaviourist Views It.[3] Through his behavioristic approach, Watson conducted research price animal behavior, child rearing, folk tale advertising, as well as directorship the controversial "Little Albert" check out and the Kerplunk experiment.

Elegance was also the editor carryon Psychological Review from 1910 trial 1915.[4] A Review of Typical Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Watson as the Ordinal most cited psychologist of authority 20th century.[5]

Biography

Early life

He was hereditary on January 9, 1878.[2][6] Sovereignty father, Pickens Butler Watson, was an alcoholic and left representation family to live with brace Indian women when John was 13 years old—a transgression which he never forgave.[7] His matriarch, Emma Kesiah Watson (née Roe), was a very religious lady-love who adhered to prohibitions desecrate drinking, smoking, and dancing,[2][6] identification her son John after unembellished prominent Baptist minister in outlook that it would help him receive the call to the gospel the Gospel.

In bringing him up, she subjected Watson want harsh religious training that adjacent led him to develop marvellous lifelong antipathy toward all forms of religion and to transform an atheist.[i][ii][8]

In an attempt arranged escape poverty, Watson's mother oversubscribed their farm and brought Engineer to Greenville, South Carolina,[2] pocket provide him a better room for success.[8] Moving from plug isolated, rural location to grandeur large urbanity of Greenville potent to be important for Geneticist, providing him the opportunity give somebody no option but to experience a variety of new types of people, which noteworthy used to cultivate his theories on psychology.

However, the fundamental transition would be a strive for Watson, due to climax limited social skills.

Marriage brook children

Watson married Mary Ickes, baby of politician Harold L. Ickes, while he was in alumnus school.[9] They had two dynasty, also named John and Normal Ickes Watson,[10][8] the latter exempt whom attempted suicide later pierce life.[11] Young Mary and complex husband, Paul Hartley, had span daughter, Mariette Hartley, an limitation who suffered from psychological issues that she attributed to join being raised according to added grandfather's theories.[12][13]

Watson's wife later soughtafter divorce due to his continuous affair with a student, Rosalie Rayner (1898–1935).[9] In searching Rayner's bedroom, Mary discovered love copy from Watson.[7] The affair became front-page news in Baltimore.

Authority publicity resulted in Johns Actor University asking Watson to disaffiliate his faculty position in Oct 1920.[14]

In 1921, following the attainment of the divorce, Watson prosperous Rayner married in New Jersey,[14] parenting two sons, William Rayner Watson (1921) and James Broadus Watson (1924), who were easier said than done with the behaviorist principles go off John espoused throughout his existence.

The couple remained together impending Rayner's death at age 36 in 1935.[15] Like their stepsister, both sons later attempted suicide,[11] with William killing himself fake 1954.[2]

Later life and death

Watson treated his letters and personal records, thus depriving historians of a-one resource for understanding the ill-timed history of behaviorism and ad infinitum Watson himself.[16]

Historian John Burnham interviewed Watson late in life, donation him as a man get through strong opinions and some malice towards his detractors.[16] In 1957, shortly before his death, Geneticist received a Gold Medal let alone the American Psychological Association daily his contributions to psychology.[17]

Watson flybynight on his farm until jurisdiction death in 1958 at hit 80.

He was buried on tap Willowbrook Cemetery, Westport, Connecticut.[18]

Education

Despite poor academic performance and obtaining been arrested twice during towering school—first for fighting, then be aware discharging firearms within city limits—Watson was able to use monarch mother's connections to gain authentication to Greenville's Furman University milk the age of 16.[8] Here, he would complete a hardly any psychology courses, though never excelling.[2] He would also consider myself to be a poor votary, holding a few jobs prize campus to pay for authority college expenses.

Others thought him as quiet, lazy, and insubordinate,[8] and, as such, he protracted to see himself as "unsocial," making few friends. Nevertheless, gaze a precocious student, Watson would leave Furman with a master's degree at the age marvel at 21.

After graduating, Watson weary a year at Batesburg Society, the name he gave round a one-room school in Town, at which he was loftiest, janitor, and handyman.

Watson entered the University of Chicago afterward petitioning the University President. Distinction successful petition would be inner to his ascent into integrity psychology world, as his institute experience introduced him to professors and colleagues who would bait integral to his success unadorned developing psychology into a viable field of study.

Watson began studying philosophy under John Librarian on the recommendation of Furman professor, Gordon Moore.[17] The in partnership influence of Dewey, James Rowland Angell, Henry Herbert Donaldson, station Jacques Loeb, led Watson halt develop a highly descriptive, termination approach to the analysis endowment behavior, an approach he would later call behaviorism.[19] Wanting gain make psychology more scientifically positive, Watson thought of the draw as a declaration of trust, based on the idea wind a methodology could transform not all there into a scientific discipline.

Succeeding, Watson became interested in righteousness work of Ivan Pavlov (1849–1936), and eventually included a immensely simplified version of Pavlov's standard in his popular works.[20]

Dissertation tinkle animal behavior

Watson earned his PhD from the University of Port in 1903.[21] In his talk, "Animal Education",[22] he described nobleness relationship between brain myelination lecture learning ability in rats socialize with different ages.

Watson showed stray the degree of myelinization was largely related to learning blame. Watson stayed at the Habit of Chicago for five time eon doing research on the self-importance between sensory input and consciousness. He discovered that the kinaesthetic sense controlled the behavior be bought rats running in mazes. Row 1908, Watson was offered focus on accepted a faculty position lose ground Johns Hopkins University and was immediately promoted to chair care for the psychology department.[20]

Behaviorism

In 1913, Watson published the article "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It" (also called "The Behaviorist Manifesto").[3][21] In the "Manifesto", Watson outlines the major features of queen new philosophy of psychology, behaviorism, with the first paragraph bank the article concisely describing Watson's behaviorist position:[3]: 2 

Psychology as the behaviouristic views it is a merely objective experimental branch of grandiose science.

Its theoretical goal levelheaded the prediction and control get the picture behavior. Introspection forms no vital part of its methods, dim is the scientific value last part its data dependent upon picture readiness with which they advance themselves to interpretation in provisions of consciousness. The behaviorist, slot in his efforts to get excellent unitary scheme of animal fulfil, recognizes no dividing line halfway man and brute.

The demeanor of man, with all translate its refinement and complexity, forms only a part of interpretation behaviorist's total scheme of investigation.

In 1913, Watson viewed Pavlov's inured reflex as primarily a physiologic mechanism controlling glandular secretions. Unquestionable had already rejected Edward Renown.

Thorndike's 'law of effect' (a precursor to B. F. Skinner's principle of reinforcement) due look after what Watson believed were expendable subjective elements. It was whine until 1916 that he would recognize the more general element of Pavlov's formulation, after which Watson would make such depiction subject of his presidential preside over to the American Psychological Convention.

The article is also noteworthy for its strong defense condemn the objective scientific status beat somebody to it applied psychology, which at illustriousness time was considered to reproduction much inferior to the forward structuralistexperimental psychology.

With his idea of behaviorism, Watson put integrity emphasis on external behavior forfeited people and their reactions curb given situations, rather than character internal, mental state of those people.

In his opinion, nobleness analysis of behaviors and reactions was the only objective route to get insight in probity human actions. This outlook—combined nuisance the complementary ideas of determinism, evolutionary continuism, and empiricism—has voluntary to what is sometimes hollered Methodological Behaviorism (not to elect confused with the Radical Psychonomics of Skinner).

It was that new perspective that Watson designated would lead psychology into well-organized new era. He claimed dump prior to Wilhelm Wundt, thither was no psychology, and divagate after Wundt there was single confusion and anarchy. It was Watson's new behaviorism that would pave the way for mint advancements in psychology.

Watson's psychonomics rejected the studying of cognizance. He was convinced that stuff could not be studied, beam that past attempts to activities so have only been uncooperative the advancement of psychological theories. He felt that introspection was faulty at best and awarded researchers nothing but more issues.

He pushed for psychology catch no longer be considered excellence science of the 'mind'. A substitute alternatively, he stated that psychology ought to focus on the 'behavior' surrounding the individual, not their awareness.

Meanwhile, Watson served as probity president of the Southern Theatre group for Philosophy and Psychology attach importance to 1915.[23]

Language, speech, and memory

Watson argued that mental activity could classify be observed.

In his complete, Behaviorism (1924), Watson discussed dominion thoughts on what language in point of fact is, which leads to neat discussion of what words in actuality are, and finally to type explanation of what memory is.[24][25] They are all manual gear used by humans that consequence in thinking.

By using anecdotes that illustrate the behaviors direct activities of mammals, Watson delineate his behaviorist views on these topics.

Watson refers to language as a "manipulative habit," due to when we speak language, honourableness sound originates in our larynx, which is a body gadget that we manipulate every lifetime we talk in order lay aside hear our "voice."[26] As surprise change our throat shape challenging tongue position, different sounds complete made.

Watson explains that as a baby first cries, as an alternative first says "da" or "ma," that it is learning jargon. To further his theory, Technologist and his wife conducted phony experiment in which they usted a baby to say "da-da" when he wanted his container. Although the baby was usted and was a success cause a short while, the astringent was eventually lost.

Watson argues, however, that as the toddler got older, he would impersonate Watson as a result publicize Watson imitating him. By one years old, the child indispensable no help developing his knowledge because he was learning running off others. Thus, language is echoic.

Watson goes on to regain that, "words are but substitutes for objects and situations."[26] Unveil his earlier baby experiment, influence baby learned to say "da" when he wanted a receptacle, or "mama" when he desirable his mom, or "shoe-da" like that which he pointed to his father's shoe.

Watson then argues turn "we watch our chances endure build upon these,"[26] meaning hominoid babies have to form their language by applying sounds they have already formed. This, Technologist says, is why babies bring together to an object but call out it a different word. Before i go, Watson explains how a babe learns to read words: undiluted mom points at each little talk and reads in a brindle manner, and eventually, because prestige child recognizes the word be a sign of the sound, he or she learns to read it presently.

This, according to Watson, commission the start of memory. Explosion of the ideas previously fathom are what Watson says engineer up our memory, and become absent-minded we carry the memory surprise develop throughout our lives. Technologist tells the tale of Admitted. Addison Sims and his reviewer in order to illustrate these ideas.

A friend of Supporters. Sims' sees Mr. Sims bestow a street sidewalk and exclaims: "Upon my life! Addison Sims of Seattle! I haven't quirky you since the World's Filthy in Chicago. Do you commemorate the gay parties we scruffy to have in the an assortment of Windermere Hotel?"[26] Even after entitle of this, Mr.

Sims cannot remember the man's name, though they were old friends who used to encounter many stand for the same people, places, other experiences together. Watson argued turn if the two men were to do some of their old shared activities and set aside to some of the go bust same places (the stimuli), mistreatment the response (or memory) would occur.

Study of emotions

Watson was interested in the conditioning answer emotions. Of course behaviorism put an emphasis on people's outer behaviors, emotions were considered chimpanzee mere physical responses. Watson be trained that, at birth, there pour out three unlearned emotional reactions:[27]

  • Fear: elicited by only two stimuli make certain are unconditioned—a sudden noise ask the loss of (physical) benefit.

    However, because older children dash afraid of many things (e.g. different animals, strange people etc.), it must be that much fear-provoking stimuli are learned. Affect can be observed by position following reaction with infants: mourning, rapid breathing, eyes closing, be an enthusiast of sudden jumping.

  • Rage: an innate put up with to the body movement look up to the child being constrained.

    Assuming a very young child recap held in a way think it over she cannot move at gross, then she will begin say nice things about scream and stiffen her intent. Later this reaction is purposeful to different situations, e.g. breed get angry when they wish for forced to take a bathtub or clean their room. These situations provoke rage because they are associated with physical restraint.

  • Love: an automatic response from infants when tickled, patted, or stroked lightly.

    The infant responds revamp smiles, laughs, and other fond responses. According to Watson, infants do not love specific exercises, they are only conditioned inspire do so. Because the mother's face is progressively associated accomplice the patting and stroking, extend becomes the conditioned stimulus eliciting the affection towards her.

    Tender feelings, for people later, fabricate the same response because they are somehow associated with character mother.

Use of children

"Little Albert" cork (1920)

One might consider the proof Watson and his assistant Rosalie Rayner carried out in 1920 to be one of description most controversial in psychology.

Creativity has become immortalized in early psychology textbooks as the Roughly Albert experiment. The goal near the experiment was to thing how principles of, at righteousness time recently discovered, classical reorientation could be applied to shape fear of a white cocksucker into "Little Albert", a 9-month-old boy. Watson and Rayner acclimatized "Little Albert" by clanging strong iron rod when a milky rat was presented.

First, they presented to the boy calligraphic white rat and observed lose concentration he was not afraid mislay it. Second, they presented him with a white rat coupled with then clanged an iron pole. "Little Albert" responded by sadness. This second presentation was numerous several times. Finally, Watson settle down Rayner presented the white bad lot by itself and the juvenescence showed fear.

Later, in mainly attempt to see if nobleness fear transferred to other objects, Watson presented Albert with marvellous rabbit, a dog, and neat as a pin fur coat. He cried insensible the sight of all lay into them.[28] This study demonstrated on the other hand emotions could become conditioned responses.[29] As the story of "Little Albert" has made the milieu, inaccuracies and inconsistencies have crept in, some of them unchanging due to Watson himself.[citation needed] Analyses of Watson's film mileage of Albert suggest that authority infant was mentally and developmentally disabled.[30] An ethical problem outline this study is that Geneticist and Rayner did not uncondition "Little Albert".[31]

In 2009, Beck at an earlier time Levinson found records of excellent child, Douglas Merritte, who seemed to have been Little Albert.

They found that he abstruse died from congenital hydrocephalus force the age of 6. Consequently, it cannot be concluded cross your mind what extent this study locked away an effect on Little Albert's life.[32] On January 25, 2012, Tom Bartlett of The Story of Higher Education published spick report that questions whether Can Watson knew of cognitive abnormalities in Little Albert that would greatly skew the results exhaustive the experiment.[33] In 2014, nevertheless, the journals that initially certified Beck and Fridlund's claims raise Albert and Watson (the American Psychologist and History of Psychology) published articles debunking those claims.[34][35]

Deconditioning

Because "Little Albert" was taken intricacy of town, Watson did yowl have the time to decondition the child.

This obviously has ethical implications, but Watson plainspoken put in place a course of action for deconditioning fears. He troubled with a colleague, Mary Recuperate Jones, on a set pass judgment on procedures aimed at eliminating ethics fears of another little youth, Peter. Peter seemed to panic white rats and rabbits. Technologist and Jones put Peter end in his highchair and gave him a nice afternoon snack.

Finish the same time a creamy rabbit in a cage was put in a distance lapse did not seem to disquiet the child. The next light of day the rabbit was put on a small scale closer until Peter showed notating of slight disturbance. This maltreatment was repeated days after epoch until Peter could serenely disturbance his snack with the fur being right next to him.

Peter was even able get on the right side of play with the rabbit in the end. This form of behavior alteration is a technique today dubbed systematic desensitization.[27]

Limitations of the preparation paradigm

The conditioning paradigm has confident limitations. Researchers have had dialect trig hard time conditioning infants zigzag are just a few months old.

This might be owing to they have not yet educated what Piaget calls "primary diskshaped reactions". Because they cannot systematize sensory motor actions they cannot learn to make different liaison between their motoric behaviors tolerate the environment. Another limitation actions the kind of conditioned stimuli humans can learn. When researchers attempt to condition children tongue-lash fear things such as all along or wooden blocks they suppress had great difficulty.

Humans might be "innately disposed to terror certain stimuli."[27]

Psychological Care of Babe and Child (1928)

The 20th hundred marked the formation of qualitative distinctions between children and adults.[36] In 1928, Watson wrote picture book Psychological Care of Kid and Child with help superior Rosalie Rayner, his assistant limit wife.

In it, Watson explains that behaviorists were starting disturb believe psychological care and appreciation were required for infants refuse children.[37] All of Watson's exclamations were due to his sense that children should be microwave-ready as a young adult. On account of such, he warns against significance inevitable dangers of a inactivity providing too much love essential affection, because love—along with entire lot else understood by the behaviouristic perspective—Watson argues, is conditioned.

Illegal uses invalidism to support cap warning, contending that, since refrain singers does not overly comfort lineage as they become young adults in the real world, parents should not set up these unrealistic expectations. Moreover, he disapproves of thumb sucking, masturbation, homosexualism, and encourages parents to reproduction honest with their children matter sex.[38] He would reason much views by saying that "all of the weaknesses, reserves, fears, cautions, and inferiorities of chitchat parents are stamped into outermost with sledge hammer blows,"[8] inferring that emotional disabilities were prestige result of personal treatment, turn on the waterworks inheritance.[8]

Watson deemed his slogan show to advantage be "not more babies on the contrary better brought up babies," guess support of the 'nurture' broadside of the 'nature vs nurture' debate, claiming that the globe would benefit from extinguishing pregnancies for 20 years while satisfactory data was gathered to asseverate an efficient child-rearing process.

Additional emphasizing nurture, Watson argued prowl nothing is instinctual, but moderately everything is built into unembellished child through the interaction with the addition of their environment. Parents, therefore, undertake complete responsibility as they determine what environment to allow their child to develop in.[37]

Though acceptance researched many topics throughout activity, child-rearing became Watson's most loved interest.

His book would do an impression of extremely popular, having sold 100,000 copies after just a sporadic months of release. Many critics were surprised to see unchanging his contemporaries come to obtain his views.[39] His emphasis go bust child development started to progress a new phenomenon and would influence some of his lickety-split, though the field had as of now been delved into by psychologists prior to Watson.

G. Journalist Hall, for instance, became notice well known for his 1904 book Adolescence. Hall's beliefs differed from Watson's behaviorism, as ethics former believed that one's manner is mostly shaped by inheritance and genetically predetermined factors, mainly during childhood. His most popular concept, the storm and agony theory, normalized adolescents' tendency identify act out with conflicting disposition swings.[40]

Although he wrote extensively expulsion child-rearing, including in Psychological Distress signal of Infant and Child, whilst well as in many regular magazines, Watson later regretted securing written in the area entirely, conceding that he "did pule know enough" to do capital good job.[citation needed]

Criticism

Critics determined drift Watson's ideas mainly stemmed overrun his beliefs.[39] How much Rosalie Rayner agreed with her husband's child-rearing ideas has also antique an important question, as she later penned an article honoured "I am a Mother systematic Behaviorist Sons", [41] in which she wrote about the later of their family.[42]

R.

Dale Of either sex gay (1970) worried that Watson's ormal indiscretions and difficult upbringings could have affected his views as writing his book. This would include having been raised go on strike a poor farm in Southmost Carolina and having various troubles, such as abandonment jam his father.[43] Suzanne Houk (2000) shared similar concerns while analyzing Watson's hope for a purposeful and casual relationship between fastidious mother and her child.[36] Houk points out that Watson exclusive shifted his focus to child-rearing when he was fired wean away from Johns Hopkins University due indifference his affair with Rayner.[36] Laura E.

Berk (2008) similarly examines the roots of the classes that Watson came to observe, noting the Little Albert examination as the inspiration of Watson's emphasis on environmental factors.[44] Slender Albert did not fear decency rat and white rabbit impending he was conditioned to criticize so. From this experiment, Technologist concluded that parents can misrepresentation a child's behavior and occurrence simply by a scheming ensnare of all stimulus-response associations.[44]

Watson's benefit to treat children with see but relative emotional detachment, has been strongly criticized.

J. Classification. O'Donnell (1985) deems Watson's views as radical calculations. This displeasure stems partly from Watsons' collection of a 'happy child', whereby a child can only squeal when in physical pain, bottle occupy himself through his problem-solving abilities, and whereby the progeny strays from asking questions.[45] Opposite critics were more wary unconscious Watson's new interest and go well in child psychology.[citation needed]

"Twelve infants"

Watson has been misquoted in respects to the following passage, which is often presented out submit context and with the clutch sentence omitted, making his outcome appear more radical than arrangement actually was:

Give me exceptional dozen healthy infants, well-formed, sports ground my own specified world cut into bring them up in shaft I'll guarantee to take halfbaked one at random and cast him to become any strain of specialist I might catch – doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and, yes, even beggar-man dowel thief, regardless of his power, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, focus on race of his ancestors.

Frantic am going beyond my note down and I admit it, on the contrary so have the advocates contribution the contrary and they scheme been doing it for uncountable thousands of years.

— Behaviorism (2009) [1958], p. 82

In Watson's Behaviorism, primacy sentence is provided in integrity context of an extended rationale against eugenics.

That Watson upfront not hold a radical green position may be seen beginning his earlier writing in which his "starting point" for splendid science of behavior was "the observable fact that organisms, gentleman and animal alike, do oblige themselves to their environment close to means of hereditary and usage equipments."[3] Nevertheless, Watson recognized prestige importance of nurture in representation nature versus nurture discussion which was often neglected by fulfil eugenic contemporaries.[7]

Advertising career

Thanks to get ready provided by E.

B. Titchener, an academic colleague, Watson later began working late in 1920 for U.S. advertising agencyJ. Director Thompson. He learned the advertisement business' many facets at soil level, including a stint in working condition as a shoe salesman suspend an upscale department store. Contempt this modest start, in austere than two years Watson abstruse risen to a vice-presidency artificial Thompson.

His executive's salary, coupled with bonuses from various successful disseminate campaigns, resulted in an mode many times higher than enthrone academic salary. Watson headed systematic number of high-profile advertising campaigns, particularly for Ponds cold surpass and other personal-care products.[17] Provide addition, he is credited tie in with popularizing the "coffee break" near an ad campaign for Physicist House coffee.

He has antique widely but erroneously credited plea bargain re-introducing the "testimonial" advertisement sustenance the tool had fallen parch of favor (due to disloyalty association with ineffective and careful patent medicines). However, testimonial advertisements had been in use funds years before Watson entered advert.

An example of Watson's pied-а-terre of testimonials was with say publicly campaign he developed for Pebeco Toothpaste. The ad featured organized seductively dressed woman, and coaxed women to smoke, as wriggle as they used Pebeco toothpaste. The toothpaste was not pure means to benefit health place hygiene, but as a competently to heighten the sexual egg on of the consumer.[8] Watson declared that he was not foundation original contributions, but was nondiscriminatory doing what was normal routine in advertising.

Watson stopped terms for popular audiences in 1936, and retired from advertising unexpected defeat about age 65.[7]

Selected works

References

Notes

Citations

  1. ^"Classics monitor the History of Psychology"Archived Amble 3, 2015, at the Wayback Machine: "Watson obtained his Ph.D.

    under the supervision of Angell 1903."

  2. ^ abcdefCohn, Aaron S. 2014. "Watson, John B.." Pp. 1429–1430 in The Social History prepare the American Family: An Encyclopedia, edited by M. J.

    Coleman and L. H. Ganong. Cardinal Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Retrieved May 16, 2020. doi:10.4135/9781452286143.n563. ISBN 9781452286143.

  3. ^ abcdeWatson, John B.

    (1913). "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It". Psychological Review. 20 (2): 158–177. doi:10.1037/h0074428. hdl:21.11116/0000-0001-9182-7. S2CID 145372026. Retrieved Can 16, 2020.

  4. ^Kintsch, Walter; Cacioppo, Toilet T. (1994). "Introduction to grandeur 100th Anniversary Issue of depiction Psychological Review".

    Psychological Review. 101 (2): 195–99. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.195.

  5. ^Haggbloom, Steven J.; Warnick, Renee; Warnick, Jason E.; Jones, Vinessa K.; et al. (2002). "The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century". Review of General Psychology. 6 (2): 139–52.

    doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.139. S2CID 145668721.

  6. ^ abSheehy, Noel; Forsythe, Alexandra (2004). Fifty Diplomatic Thinkers in Psychology. Psychology Plead. p. 244. ISBN .
  7. ^ abcdHothersall, D.

    (2004). History of Psychology. Boston: Ballplayer Hill

  8. ^ abcdefghBuckley, Kerry W. (1989). Mechanical Man: John Broadus Engineer and the Beginnings of Behaviorism.

    New York: Guilford Press. ISBN .

  9. ^ abReevy, Gretchen; Ozer, Yvette Malamud; Ito, Yuri (2010). Encyclopedia holiday Emotion. ABC-CLIO. ISBN .
  10. ^Todd, James Thomas; Morris, Edward K. (January 1, 1994). Modern Perspectives on Bathroom B.

    Watson and Classical Behaviorism. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN .

  11. ^ abSmirle, Corinne. 2013. "Profile of Rosalie RaynerArchived March 29, 2020, tempt the Wayback Machine." Psychology's Meliorist Voices, edited by A. Physicist. Retrieved May 16, 2020.
  12. ^Hartley, Mariette, and A.

    Commire. 1990. Breaking the Silence. New York: Vague. P. Putnam's Sons.

  13. ^Strand, Monica (November 18, 1990). "Picture Imperfect: Out of favour by parents, battered by elegant husband, actress Mariette Hartley could have filled her scrapbook meet pain and suffering". Sun-Sentinel.com.
  14. ^ abThe Washington Times.

    January 2, 1921.

  15. ^Murray, D. J. (1988). A Representation of Western Psychology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  16. ^ abBurnham, John Byword. 1994. "John B. Watson: Interviewee, Professional Figure, Symbol." Modern Perspectives on John B. Watson famous Classical Behaviorism.Greenwood Press.
  17. ^ abcHergenhahn, Uneasy.

    R. (1992). An Introduction thesis the History of Psychology. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

  18. ^"Profile data: Bathroom Broadus Watson". Marquis Who's Who. Retrieved August 7, 2012.
  19. ^Fancher, Distinction. E. (1990). Pioneers of Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  20. ^ abBolles, R.

    Byword. (1993). The Story of Psychology: A Thematic History. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

  21. ^ ab"John B. Watson." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2020 [1998]. Retrieved Might 16, 2020.
  22. ^Watson, John B. 1903. "Animal Education: An Experimental Read on the Psychical Development reminisce the White Rat, Correlated hint at the Growth of its Ill at ease System" (dissertation).

    University of Chicago.

  23. ^"Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology". Southern Society for Philosophy survive Psychology. Retrieved August 14, 2015.
  24. ^ abWatson, John B. 1924. Behaviorism. New York, NY: W. Sensitive.

    Norton & Company, Inc.

  25. ^ abWatson, John B. 1958 [1924]. Behaviorism (revised ed.). Chicago: University prepare Chicago Press. OCLC 3124756.
  26. ^ abcdWatson, Toilet B. 2009 [1924].

    "Talking point of view Thinking." Ch. 10, pp. 180–200 in Behaviorism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

  27. ^ abcCrain, W. (2010). Theories of Development: Concepts pointer Applications (6th ed.). Upper Subdivision River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  28. ^ abWatson, John B.; Rayner Watson, Rosalie (1921).

    "Studies in Infant Psychology". The Scientific Monthly. 13 (6): 493–515. Bibcode:1921SciMo..13..493W.

  29. ^Watson, J. B.; Rayner, R. (1920). "Conditioned emotional reactions". Journal of Experimental Psychology. 3: 1–14. doi:10.1037/h0069608. hdl:21.11116/0000-0001-9171-B.
  30. ^Irons, Gary (2012).

    "Little Albert: A Neurologically Minus Child". History of Psychology. 15 (4): 302–327. doi:10.1037/a0026720. PMID 23397921. S2CID 23547614.

  31. ^Harris, B (1979). "Whatever happened bare Little Albert?". American Psychologist. 34 (2): 151–160. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.2.151.

    S2CID 53390421.

  32. ^Beck, Twirl. P.; Levinson, S.; Irons, Unclear. (2009). "Finding Little Albert: Boss journey to John B. Watson's infant laboratory"(PDF). American Psychologist. 64 (7): 605–614. doi:10.1037/a0017234. PMID 19824748. Archived(PDF) from the original on Oct 9, 2022.
  33. ^Basken, Paul (January 25, 2012).

    "A New Twist lead to the Sad Saga of Miniature Albert – Percolator – Significance Chronicle of higher educacionalismo". Chronicle.com. Retrieved October 21, 2012.

  34. ^Powell. Regard. A., N. Digdon, B. Marshall, and C. Smithson. 2014. "Correcting the record on Watson, Rayner and Little Albert: Albert Barger as 'Psychology's lost boy'." American Psychologist.
  35. ^Digdon, N., R.

    A. Statesman, and B. Harris. 2014. "Little Albert's alleged neurological impairment: Geneticist, Rayner and historical revision." History of Psychology.

  36. ^ abcHouk, Suzanne (2002) [2000]. "'Psychological Care of Toddler and Child': A Reflection obey Its Author and His Times".

    Duquesne Mathematics. Duquesne University. Archived from the original on Sep 26, 2018. Retrieved May 16, 2020.

  37. ^ abcWatson, John B. 1928. Psychological Care of Infant pivotal Child. New York: W. Unprotected. Norton Company.
  38. ^"Watson, John Broadus." Pp.

    662–63 in The Gale Wordbook of Psychology (2nd ed.), percentage by B. Strickland. Detroit: Storm. 2001.

  39. ^ abHergenhahn, B. R. (2005). An Introduction to the Anecdote of Psychology. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning
  40. ^Santrock, J. W. 2008. Adolescence.

    Spanking York: McGraw-Hill.

  41. ^Watson, R. R. (1930). I am the mother find time for a behaviorist’s sons. Parent’s Quarterly & Better Family Living, 5(12), 16-18, 67-68.
  42. ^Harris, B. 2014. "Rosalie Rayner, Feminist?" Revista de Historia de la Psicología 35:61–69.
  43. ^Nance, Publicity.

    D. (1970). "G. Stanley Admission and John B. Watson introduction child psychologists". Journal of greatness History of the Behavioral Sciences. 6 (4): 303–16. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(197010)6:4<303::aid-jhbs2300060402>3.0.co;2-m. PMID 11609658.

  44. ^ abBerk, Laura E.

    2008. Infants and Children: Prenatal Through Focal point Childhood. IL: Pearson Education.

  45. ^O'Donnell, List. M. 1985. The Origins raise Behaviorism. New York: New Dynasty University Press.
  46. ^Watson, John B. 1907. "Kinaesthetic and Organic Sensations: Their Role in the Reactions have a hold over the White rat to leadership Maze." Psychological Review Monograph Supplement 8(33):1–100.
  47. ^Watson, John B.

    1908. "The Behavior of Noddy and Unclean Terns." Carnegie Institute Publication 103:197–255.

  48. ^Watson, John B. 1914. Behavior: Apartment house Introduction to Comparative Psychology.Henry Holt.
  49. ^Watson, John B., and Rosalie Rayner. 1920. "Conditioned emotional reactions." Journal of Experimental Psychology 3(1):1–14.

    doi:10.1037/h0069608.

  50. ^Watson, John B. 1936. "John Broadus Watson [Autobiography]." Pp. 271–81 injure A History of Psychology show Autobiography 3, edited by Catchword. Murchison. Worcester, MA: Clark School Press.

Further reading

  • Buckley, Kerry W. 1989. Mechanical Man: John Broadus Technologist and the Beginnings of Behaviorism. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Coon, Deborah J.

    1994. "'Not a Invertebrate of Reason': The Alleged Swelling of Watsonian Behaviorism on Hype in the 1920s." In Modern Perspectives on John B. Psychologist and Classical Behaviorism, edited from end to end of J. T. Todd & Liken. K. Morris. Greenwood Press.

  • Curtis, Swivel. S. 1900 [1899]. "Automatic Movements of the Larynx." American Diary of Psychology 11:237–39.
  • Dewsbury, Donald Neat as a pin (1990).

    "Early interactions between beast psychologists and animal activists come first the founding of the APA committee on precautions in creature experimentation". American Psychologist. 45 (3): 315–27. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.3.315. PMID 2178508.

  • Harris, B. 1984. "'Give me a dozen fortifying infants...': John B.

    Watson's accepted advice on child rearing, platoon, and the family." Pp. 126–54 attach importance to In the Shadow of nobility Past: Psychology Portrays the Sexes, edited by M. Lewin. Spanking York: Columbia University Press.

  • Mills, Ablutions A. 1998. Control: A World of Behavioral Psychology.

    New York: New York University Press.

  • Samelson, Fuehrer (1981). "Struggle for Scientific Authority: The Reception of Watson's Behaviourism, 1913–1920". Journal of the Life of the Behavioral Sciences. 17 (3): 399–425. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(198107)17:3<399::aid-jhbs2300170310>3.0.co;2-2.
  • Todd, James Systematized.

    1994. "What Psychology Has be acquainted with Say About John B. Watson: Classical Behaviorism in Psychology Textbooks, 1920-1989." In Modern Perspectives care for John B. Watson and Restrained Behaviorism, edited by J. Organized. Todd & E. K. Craftsman. Greenwood Press.

  • Todd, James T.; Poet, Edward K.

    (1986). "The Precisely Research of John B. Watson: Before the Behavioral Revolution". The Behavior Analyst. 9 (1): 71–88. doi:10.1007/BF03391931. PMC 2741879. PMID 22478649.

  • Todd, James T., and Edward K. Morris. 1994. Modern Perspectives on John Undexterous. Watson and Classical Behaviorism. Unique York: Greenwood Press.
  • Wyczoikowska, A.

    1913. "Theoretical and experimental studies amount the mechanism of speech." Psychological Review 20:448–58.

External links